Course Syllabus

Philosophy 260 - Business Ethics

Spring 2013

 

Instructor:                  Tim Linnemann          (office hours: Tuesday/Thursday 11:30-1:30 B100A)

timlinnemann@gmail.com

206-919-6934

 

Text:   All readings will be available electronically. I will be emailing attachments with the reading selections which you can then print at your discretion.

 

Course Description:             Business Ethics is a part of the field of moral philosophy known as Applied Ethics – a field which also is home to topics such as Biomedical Ethics, Engineering Ethics, Environmental Ethics, to name a few. Applied Ethics focuses on the deliberations surrounding specific behavior as opposed to creating a general moral theory – in the case of Business Ethics the focus is on commercial activity. It goes without saying that these activities and the ways in which they are conducted can have huge ethical ramifications, but we won’t confine ourselves to the scandals alone. Business and the way it is conducted has the potential to promote much good or to engender much evil, but disputes over what actually is good and evil notwithstanding, it also has the power to radically affect the shape of human life.

            Topics in Business Ethics are wide ranging. The ethical questions facing employees, employers, and corporations themselves are very different in their scope, in the resources required to answer them, and in the diverse facets of human life that they concern. We will be traveling from the very personal to the global and back many times by the end of the quarter. For this reason, completion of this course should also provide you with a decent introduction to the philosophical methods used for addressing moral and ethical questions in general.

 

Objectives & Outcomes: The no. 1 goal for this class is to develop your access, awareness, and ability to engage with the ethical dimensions to be encountered in the business world. This class is not here to inform you what “the rules” are, or what choices you should make in certain situations. The design of this course will require you to step into defining and defending answers to questions over which there is extensive disagreement. But you will not be left only to your own devices. We’ll be getting acquainted with a host of theories and concepts that will help us frame these debates and provide you with resources you’ll be able to apply to whatever unique ethical dilemmas that life outside of the classroom throws at you. I hope this class will empower you to be able to take up a sincere exploration and evaluation of the ethical considerations that permeate business – with the additional bonus of perhaps also empowering you to be a force for making a more ethical world! (I won’t be grading you on that)

 

Grading:                     Class Attendance/Participation           25%*

                                    Journal Responses                             25%

                                    Presentation                                        13%

                                    Research Paper                                  23%

Response Paper                                 13%

 

 

Journals: Every time we have a new reading assigned for a class day there will be a short response paper due. This paper needs to be 1-2 pages typed or 2-3 pages if handwritten. In each journal I will be looking to see two things represented. I want you to present some idea or argument from the reading and then to critically evaluate it. These assignments have a three-fold purpose: First, they are a way of encouraging you to have completed the readings prior to class. Second, they are good practice at articulating philosophical ideas on paper. There is nothing I have discovered that develops one’s philosophical abilities faster than just writing. Third, these journals will hopefully help stimulate class discussion as you will have thought about what you think about the readings prior to coming to class. Thus, you’ll already have things prepared that you want to talk about and are ready to share.

 

Papers:  You will have two papers assigned in the course of the quarter. The first will be a 1500 word min paper where I’ll have you research some contemporary incident in the business world that has an ethical dimension to it. It is crucial that your topic have room for legitimate rational disagreement. The paper will require you to frame the debate, take a stance, and defend it. I’ll be providing much more guidance as we gear up for this assignment.

            The second paper will see you giving a critical response to a paper written by one of your classmates for the first assignment. This paper has only a 500 word min, so it won’t be worth as much of your final grade. The exchanges will be anonymous.

 

Presentations: During the course of the quarter you will be required to perform one short class presentation. After we get through the first couple weeks of introductory material I’ll be having you sign up for readings. In the presentation you will be giving a critical (not necessarily negative!) evaluation of the reading – present a response and defend it. These assignments are functionally very similar to the journals, but done through a different modality. You will not be required to turn in journals for readings in which you perform presentations.

 

Class Attendance: I am making attendance and participation a fourth of the final grade to emphasize the importance of philosophic engagement in its social dimension. Most of the issues we will be discussing in Business Ethics are of a broadly social concern – whether this is expressed in federal or state laws or happens behind board-room doors, the implications of these debates have consequences for many people, and the way in which we justify these practices as much concerns each other as ourselves. I will be striving to create a classroom atmosphere where these debates can be pursued productively and comfortably, but I will need your help in realizing this project. Three things will be of particular advantage: mutual respect as a standard for discussion, careful listening, and critical engagement.

For our purposes, respect must not be a conclusion, but rather a premise. Disrespectful engagement is unprofessional and unphilosophical regardless of whether it is offensive. As an example, to think a certain line of thinking is indicative of a lack of intelligence does nothing to provide a reasonable argument for why we should consider such reasoning philosophically problematic. The disrespectful attitude does nothing to add to the debate (whatever else it does contribute).

            Careful listening and critical engagement are very closely connected. To properly respond to an idea, one must first understand it as thoroughly as possible. But just understanding the point of someone’s idea is also not enough – we must analyze its virtues and deficiencies. Our discussions will always be oriented to gauging the strength of proposed resolutions to ethical conundrums, and in as much as we will contribute ideas of our own, we will be assessing how well our attempts fare as well. When engaging in this way with one another an open audience is as crucial as a critically invested audience – respect helps prepare us for both.

Finally, (back by popular demand!) anyone who misses more than 4 sessions will automatically fail the course. This is not negotiable, so please respect it!

 

Student academic conduct: The principle of academic honesty underlies all that we do and applies to all courses at Bellevue College.  One kind of academic dishonesty is plagiarism, which may take many forms, including, but not limited to, using a paper written by someone else, using printed sources word-for-word without proper documentation, and paraphrasing or summarizing the ideas of others without acknowledging the source.  Plagiarism can also occur when non-written ideas are taken without documentation--using someone else's design or performance idea, for example.  In short, plagiarism is passing off someone else's ideas, words, or images as your own; it amounts to intellectual theft--whether or not it was your intention to steal.  Bellevue College instructors have access to commercial plagiarism detection software, so please be advised that any work you submit may be tested for plagiarism.

 

Participating in academic dishonesty in any way, including writing a paper or taking a test for someone else, may result in severe penalties.  Dishonestly produced papers automatically receive a grade of "F" without the possibility of make-up.  The Dean of Student Services will also be notified of such conduct, and repetition of the behavior will result in progressively more serious disciplinary action (for example, an instructor may recommend that the student fail the course for a second offense or even that a student be expelled for a serious offense, such as stealing an exam).

 

Grades lowered for plagiarism or other forms of dishonesty may be appealed through the regular channels, and any further disciplinary action taken by the Dean may also be appealed through existing processes.

 

Information about Bellevue College's copyright guidelines can be found at: http://bellevuecollege.edu/lmc/links/copyright.html

 

Disclaimer: I reserve the right to make any changes to the course (content, grading, etc.). Further, I reserve the right to establish procedures for grading of students in exceptional cases. All and any modifications to this syllabus will be in accordance with the rules and regulations of Bellevue College. This syllabus does not constitute a contract between any combination of the student, the professor, or Bellevue College.

 

Brief List of Course Topics

 

Boat-loads of Introductory Material

            Code of Intellectual Conduct; Moral Disagreement; Moral Relativism; Egoism; Meta-theory;

The “Classical” Ethical Theories

            Kantian Deontology, Utilitarianism, Virtue Ethics, Social Contract Theories, Ethics of Care

Fiduciary Duties

Whistle-blowing

Affirmative Action

International Business

Social & Economic Justice

Success & the American Dream