ctcLink Accessibility
This page outlines some of the issues regarding ctcLink and accessibility.
This page outlines some of the issues regarding ctcLink and accessibility.
ctcLink continues to refine and improve the user experience for users across a number of areas. Please check back here for updates on how the BC campus is responding to accessibility concerns regarding ctcLink.
While ctcLink brings many good things to our campus, we also know that the system is inaccessible to many screen-reader and other assistive technology users. Here are the issues that we know about:
Campus is currently working to organize sessions on supporting assistive technology users who will be prevented from independently accomplishing tasks in ctcLink. Be on the lookout for future communications to learn more!
We would like to invite you to our Monthly Accessibility and ctcLink Open Forum. Please visit the accessibility forum webpage for details on:
The Disability Support Services Council (the statewide council of Disability Services offices) has been advocating for ctcLink to be accessible to screen reader users since 2011. The DSSC has submitted three formal letters through the state-wide governance structure up to SBCTC since 2017. Individual DSSC representatives from live colleges have raised concerns that ctcLink is not accessible for screen reader using students and employees since the test colleges went live in 2015, and with each college that goes live Disability Services offices submit tickets on behalf of students when individual accessibility issues are discovered (every time an individual field or button is not screen reader accessible, a new ticket needs to be made). DSSC as a council has had multiple meetings with SBCTC IT and ctcLink project employees over the past year. Along with DSSC board members meeting individually with the SBCTC CIO, representatives have also attended DSSC’s quarterly membership meetings in Fall 2020 and Winter 2021. DSSC continues to have regular communication with SBCTC regarding ctcLink accessibility.
The Committee on Accessible Technology Oversight also wrote a letter to SBCTC in Winter 2020 and continues to advocate from their position. CATO members have also attended meetings with SBCTC IT/ ctcLink employees to give information about accessibility testing and where CATO members have tested for accessibility issues with ctcLink and the OAAP.
Currently Proposal 1259 has been proposed as part of BC governance advocating BC delay going live with ctcLink until both the inaccessibility and confidentiality issues are addressed. The Council for Inclusion and Diversity (CID) is the sponsoring council.